The short version
Key points
- The proportion of 10 to 15-year-olds with an account on at least one restricted platform fell from 52.4% to 42.1%.
- Use of at least one restricted platform fell from 85.9% to 81.5%.
- Parental unawareness of recent social media use increased from 23.3% to 33.3%.
- The evaluation found no measurable change in sleep, self-esteem, wellbeing or psychological distress.
- Apple’s Australian App Store age checks show that age assurance is expanding beyond social media platforms.
What the restrictions cover
From 10 December 2025, platforms including Facebook, Instagram, TikTok, Snapchat, Reddit, X and YouTube were required to take reasonable steps to prevent Australians under 16 from creating or keeping accounts. Children and parents are not fined if a child gets through the system.
The restrictions do not completely prevent children from viewing public content that does not require an account. Standalone messaging and online gaming services are generally outside the current restrictions. This means watching public content without logging in is treated differently from having an account that enables features such as comments, uploads and notifications.
Fewer accounts, but use remains high
eSafety released its three-month report on 31 July 2026. It followed children aged 10 to 15 and their families from before the restrictions began through the first three months of operation.
The proportion of children holding an account on at least one restricted platform fell from 52.4% to 42.1%, which the report described as a statistically significant reduction. However, reported use fell only from 85.9% to 81.5%. More than four in five surveyed children were still using at least one age-restricted platform after three months.
Among all children surveyed, 13% had an account before the restrictions but no longer had one after three months, while 37% had accounts at both points. Of the children who still held accounts, 50.2% said the platform had not asked them to confirm their age. A further 18.2% said their age had been estimated incorrectly, and 37.1% said their account listed them as aged 16 or over.
Activity shifted and parents knew less
The report indicated that children’s online activity shifted rather than disappearing. Reddit use increased, while daily use of messaging platforms rose from 40.5% to 52.3%. Some children used virtual private networks or received help from parents, although these workarounds were described as much less common than other ways of getting through age checks.
Parental awareness declined. Before the restrictions, 23.3% of parents were unaware that their child had recently used social media. Three months later, that figure had increased to 33.3%. Among parents of children aged 10 to 12, unawareness rose from 35% to 49.1%.
The report also recorded some changes that parents may regard as positive. The proportion of children who thought people their age without social media were missing out fell from 43.3% to 36.3%. Parents reported less pressure to allow social media because other families were doing so.
No early change in measured wellbeing
After three months, the evaluation found no measurable change in sleep, self-esteem, general wellbeing or psychological distress. Around 65% of children said the restrictions had made no difference to them, approximately 20% reported a negative impact and about 12% reported a positive impact.
The report describes these findings as an early snapshot rather than a final verdict. The wider evaluation is scheduled to continue for two years, so the first three-month results cannot establish the long-term effects of the policy.
TechManPat’s conclusion
My view is that the government chose an overly broad response to a genuine problem. The early figures show fewer accounts, but social media use remains high, parental awareness has declined and there has been no measurable improvement in the reported wellbeing measures. I think the government should be required to demonstrate measurable safety benefits, and if the restrictions cannot do that, the law should be narrowed or repealed.
This knowledge-centre summary is based on the linked TechManPat video and reflects the information available when it was published. Check current pricing, availability and policies before acting.



